pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken?

To: Michael Newton <kimbrr@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken?
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:34:43 +1000
Cc: "Siekas, Greg" <greg.siekas@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.SGI.4.58.0809041126560.300760489@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <258BABDDC780384FBF0FF15CCFDFABE10673E89D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1220490563.4544.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0809041126560.300760489@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:29 +1000, Michael Newton wrote:

> that may be.. nevertheless neither the System.map nor /proc/kallsyms
> contain the addresses coming out of /proc/<pid>/stat, nor entries
> for the symbols as reported by ps -l. How is ps -l doing it?

Looks like it uses /proc/<pid>/wchan... sounds like a much better way
to fix this, since we won't need that big global mem allocation then.

cheers.

--
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>