| To: | Michael Newton <kimbrr@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:34:43 +1000 |
| Cc: | "Siekas, Greg" <greg.siekas@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SGI.4.58.0809041126560.300760489@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <258BABDDC780384FBF0FF15CCFDFABE10673E89D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1220490563.4544.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0809041126560.300760489@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:29 +1000, Michael Newton wrote: > that may be.. nevertheless neither the System.map nor /proc/kallsyms > contain the addresses coming out of /proc/<pid>/stat, nor entries > for the symbols as reported by ps -l. How is ps -l doing it? Looks like it uses /proc/<pid>/wchan... sounds like a much better way to fix this, since we won't need that big global mem allocation then. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken?, Michael Newton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken?, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken?, Michael Newton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: proc.psinfo.wchan_s broken?, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |