| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Demise of libpcp_pmda.so (was Re: pcp updates) |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:29:53 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1218613488.4645.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1218609809.4645.46.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1218610990.2914.14.camel@bozo> <1218613488.4645.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:44:48 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: nscott> Yes, I changed the build to no create&use a shared library version nscott> of libpcp_pmda.so anymore (except on Windows, where the dll is used) This is going to make life difficult for those pmdas which are not built as part of the OSS pcp build or pmdas which are already in the field and which used libpcp_pmda.so and cannot/would not be rebuild for whatever reason. Besides, what's wrong with having a shared library anyway? It saves the memory - only one copy of text is ever need to be loaded and allows for bug fixes which do not require rebuilds. max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pcp updates, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Demise of libpcp_pmda.so (was Re: pcp updates), Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |