| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Review: PCP & pmlogger take too long to start |
| From: | Michael Newton <kimbrr@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:41:45 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1183417678.15488.257.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.SGI.4.58.0706271012280.2186626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0706271124250.2186626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0706271715321.2351218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1182996127.15488.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0706291810180.4792701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1183355238.15488.217.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1183356141.15488.223.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0707021658520.7708406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1183417678.15488.257.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:02 +1000, Michael Newton wrote:
> > you know pmlogger is through its initialisation, but now
> > you need to give it a little time to finish cleaning up the
> > connection you have just relinquished, so as to be ready to
> > talk to a real client.
>
> That bit I don't buy - the startup script uses pmlc to connect
> as this guarantees that pmlogger is started up and ready - there
> isn't any "little time" after a pmlc connection where pmlogger is
> not available for another connection. It seems that additional
> sleep there is redundant - I'll ask Ken though when he's back if
> he can remember why it was added (any chance you can do some rlog
> sleuthing, see if it was added in response to a bug?).
p_rlog only shows me back to 1.22, which still has the pre-exit sleep
> Really odd that it was a full three second sleep too.
5, i believe
i'll make the agreed changes and retest. Unless something else happens in
the meantime, i'll commit it.. this is taking too log.. minor fix-ups can
be done later
Dr.Michael("Kimba")Newton kimbrr@xxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Review: PCP & pmlogger take too long to start, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: PCP & pmlogger take too long to start, Michael Newton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Review: PCP & pmlogger take too long to start, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Review: PCP & pmlogger take too long to start, Michael Newton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |