| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PCP SourceForge |
| From: | Alan Hoyt <ahyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:27:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | mtw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, markgw@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1133284173.26805.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050411093715.A15051@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504220823110.9546@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <436A02CA.3020202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <436ADFC1.4000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1132774670.4368.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511261419560.20979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133185136.29186.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438BAA52.4030006@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511282234410.8650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133284173.26805.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Ken McDonell wrote: Deja vu – I’ve heard this a few times over the past few years. I am not sure what you mean by a "suitable gatekeeper" though. When you consider for example how much Oracle has changed from Oracle 7 (which I believe was the target of the Oracle pmda) to Oracle 10g today - a massive rewrite of the pmda is probably required rather than just having someone act as a “gatekeeper”. I would imagine the other database pmda’s are in a similar mode of decay thus substantially diminishing the value of these agents. So, I am not really clear what your expectations are ... unless you are offering up your expertise as the gatekeeper – if so, you can have the "pcpaddons" sourceforge site. I merely set it up to facilitate and share the two pcp efforts I am currently working on.On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 22:42 -0800, Michael Werner wrote:Hi Alan, Tell me how to get your pmda when it is ready. Solaris packages are next up in my queue. What is happening with the DB pmdas ?My understanding is that SGI has (internally) gone through all the necessary procedures to release this code under the GPL once a suitable gatekeeper has volunteered and on the understanding that SGI will provide no support for this code base (the products that were built around these particular PMDAs are long since moribund). In practical terms that probably means once we get organized on the outside, this is gated by Mark Goodwin's bandwidth to organize the package from the inside. Alan . |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PCP SourceForge, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PCP SourceForge, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |