pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PCP SourceForge [was Re: Java JNI PMAPI]

To: Michael Werner <mtw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PCP SourceForge [was Re: Java JNI PMAPI]
From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:59:51 +1100 (EST)
Cc: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Hoyt <ahyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511281512250.28341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050411093715.A15051@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504220823110.9546@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <436A02CA.3020202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <436ADFC1.4000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1132774670.4368.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511261419560.20979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133185136.29186.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511281512250.28341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Michael Werner wrote:
> ..
> > Are you feeding these changes back to Mark?  I'd hate for the core PCP
> > code to become forked.
> 
> All my source code mods will be available from sourceforge, along with
> the bug reports and release notes.  It will be a simple matter for
> Mark to diff the revision tags and get the mods.  I've been careful to
> ensure that my changes are compatible with SGI's internal build reqs.

Hi Michael,

Firstly, thanks for creating the new sf project. I agree with comments
from others that it needs a more accurate title & keywords, but in
concept it's an excellent step forward for PCP.

Your changes are against pcp-2.4.0 (as currently on oss.sgi.com), right?
The new release coming is pcp-2.5.0 so you'll need to reconcile against
the new code base. That shouldn't be a big deal but I'd rather you did
it and fed the resulting patches back to me. I'll push 2.5.0 up to
oss.sgi.com as soon as I can. I was hoping to include some libpcp changes
(as mentioned in earlier mail), but given the level of interest at the
moment, it may be better just to push 2.5.0 up to oss asap, and then have
a series of incremental minor releases as people feed patches back to me.

Does this sound like a good plan for all?

Thanks
-- Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>