pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT?]: Linux per-process disk and network I/O metrics?

To: Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OT?]: Linux per-process disk and network I/O metrics?
From: Scott Chapman <scott_list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:18:41 -0700
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0308130539040.89624-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0308130539040.89624-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: scott_list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 12:41, Ken McDonell wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Scott Chapman wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I see that PCP gives some XFS process-level disk I/O metrics. ...
>
> Which metrics are you referring to ... I don't believe there are any
> process-level metrics from XFS.

My bad. :(  I was reading the metric list wrong.

> > ... Does anyone
> > have any idea of the availability of disk I/O metrics for ext2/ext3 and
> > other file systems?  Any other tools that have this?
> >
> > Same for network traffic?
>
> This is more a matter of kernel instrumentation ... in Linux this sort
> of process-level accounting of resource consumption is typically not
> available.
>
> If this data _is_ present, please let us know, as the effort to export
> it via PCP is minimal.

I'm not aware of any such data.  It seems Linux is rather short on some useful 
metrics that other Unix flavors have.  This would be a major improvement in 
Linux.  It could surpass other Unix flavors in this arena if there was motive 
force in the kernel development core.

If anyone has influence on kernel development, please contact the appropriate 
people!  I understand that Linus is not big on instrumentation.  Don't know 
if that's true or not, just something I heard somewhere.

Cordially,
Scott



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>