pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: docs

To: Alan Hoyt <ahoyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: docs
From: Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:22:46 +1100
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3E63A3E6.1030409@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
We've already released PCP 2.3 for IRIX, and our Linux release to
support the SGI Altix 3000 platform, so I'd like to re-sync the latest
open source official release to be 2.3, especially as all of these are
built from a single source tree.

We'll move almost immediately to a 2.4 dev stream for the open source
version.

So the definition if what's "in" a particular release is (a) somewhat
arbitrary, and (b) influenced by factors outside the open source
release of PCP.


On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote:

> It seems odd not to provide "complete" OS platform support in a
> release... but obviously it's your call.
>
>  - Alan -
>
> Ken McDonell wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>So you want the balance of the Solaris changes to go into 2.4 "dev"?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >That would be my preference.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>