| To: | "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New bug is found for case 022 with pcp-2.3.0-8 |
| From: | kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:23:04 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | "PCP (E-mail)" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <957BD1C2BF3CD411B6C500A0C944CA2602BCE9B7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Zhang, Sonic wrote:
> Hi,
> This may be a real bug of the pcp daemon or pcp utility "pminfo". It
> seems a ' ] ' is lost in the out put of pminfo.
> See the attachment for the out.bad file.
No, the QA test post-processes the output from pminfo, and this is where
the matching ']' is getting lost.
When I get a correct 022.full from you (refer to related mail), I'm sure
the matching ']' will be there in the unfiltered output from pminfo(1).
> > inst [19897 or "019897 gawk
> > function print_line() {
> > if (line_num > 0) {
> > for(i=0;i<line_num-1;i++){
> > printf("%s\\n", line[i])
> > }
> > printf("%s", line[line_num-1]);
> > printf("\n")
> > line_num = 0
> > }
> > }
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: I find the cause of the failure in case 374, kenmcd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: New bug is found for case 022 with pcp-2.3.0-8, kenmcd |
| Previous by Thread: | New bug is found for case 022 with pcp-2.3.0-8, Zhang, Sonic |
| Next by Thread: | RE: New bug is found for case 022 with pcp-2.3.0-8, kenmcd |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |