pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Funny pmie behavior

To: David Douthitt <DDouthitt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Funny pmie behavior
From: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:02:06 +1100 (EST)
Cc: markgw@xxxxxxx, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301022049040.10433-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Oops, this time with attachments ... sorry.

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
> 
> > ...
> 
> David, could you please try the following:
> 
> 1. upgrade to PCP 2.2.2-11 if that is not already the version you're
>    using
> 
> 2. get the source rpm or the source tarball from oss.sgi.com for this
>    version
> 
> 3. apply the attached patches to the two pmie source files
> 
>       - src/pmie/src/act.sk
>       - src/pmie/src/dstruct.c
> 
>    rebuild and install the pmie binary
> 
> 4. run your test case using -Dappl2 on the pmie command line
> 
> 5. mail me the pmie configuration file and the std err from the
>    pmie process with -Dappl2 and a ps -ef | grep pmie listing
> 
> I've been looking at the current top-of-tree source and cannot see
> how we can be _not_ calling waitpid() at all the appropriate places,
> so hopefully these additional diagnostics will give me a clue.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 

Attachment: act.sk.patch
Description: act.sk.patch

Attachment: dstruct.c.patch
Description: dstruct.c.patch

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>