pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: CGLE (was Re: PCP patch for top/libgtop conversion)

To: "Davis, Todd C" <todd.c.davis@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: CGLE (was Re: PCP patch for top/libgtop conversion)
From: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:21:54 +1000 (EST)
Cc: "'Mike Mason'" <mmlnx@xxxxxxxxxx>, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <29AD895CE780D511A8870002A50A666D04F90841@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Davis, Todd C wrote:

> I would say that PCP fully meets the CGLE requirements and I don't have any
> technical issues at this time but then my exposure to PCP is less than a
> week old. My biggest issue at this time is the documentation. It is very
> good documentation but there is no distinction between the open source and
> SGI proprietary components. I personally would like to see the open source
> docs scrubbed of all SGI proprietary references.

Could I ask which documentation you are referring to?  Options might be ...

- man pages in the oss.sgi.com rpms ... these should be OK I believe

- html tutorial (that I don't think we've released to open source, but
  certainly could ... it is a resource issue, so if someone volunteered
  to audit, cleanup and edit the html we could certainly work together
  on this)

- the User and Administrator Guide and the Programmer's Guide from
  techpubs.sgi.com ... the Programmer's Guide is platform agnostic I
  believe, the other Guide is IRIX-centric and we're in the process of
  splitting this into an IRIX version and a Linux version

- perhaps something else, if so what?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>