| To: | "Mark Goodwin" <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel.all.uptime units |
| From: | "Mike Mason" <mmlnx@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:17:54 -0800 |
| Cc: | <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201071125350.21606-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I'm looking at both top and libgtop. I haven't decided yet if I'm going to convert one or both of them. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Goodwin" <markgw@xxxxxxx> To: "Mike Mason" <mmlnx@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: Re: kernel.all.uptime units > On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Mike Mason wrote: > > > Why is the kernel.all.uptime metric provided in hour units ... > > Thanks Mike, I have added your patch. > > Are you converting top (as shipped in the procps package), or libgtop > (as used by gtop, shipped in the gtop package)? > > -- Mark > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel.all.uptime units, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Representing task memory maps in PCP, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel.all.uptime units, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Representing task memory maps in PCP, Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |