pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PCP Build for Alpha

To: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PCP Build for Alpha
From: Eric Roman <eroman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:49:44 -0800
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003141026390.16246-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20000309141935.A16210@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003141026390.16246-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: eroman@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > I've built a binary RPM for PCP 2.1.4 on Red Hat/Alpha/6.0.  I haven't given
> > it a full testing yet, but it seems ok, (pmstat, pmval work as expected).
> 
> So the "delayed reporting" problem with pmstat et al has now gone away?
> (if so it must have been stdout buffering - I added a change to these
> tools to force stdout to be line buffered).

I don't think this bug was in the line buffering.  It went away when I
futzed around w/ the sginap macro (CLK_TCK was assumed at 100, it's 1000
on Alpha.).  I think you fixed that in PCP 2.1.4-2

> > Any interest?
> 
> I am interested from the portability perspective, but you are the only
> PCP on Linux-Alpha user that I know of. 

Ok.  I thought you might be interested in putting a binary on the web
page.

-- 
Eric Roman  <eroman@xxxxxxx>     NERSC Future Technologies Group
(510)486-6420                    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>