pagg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Process Notification / pnotify user: Job

To: serue@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Process Notification / pnotify user: Job
From: Erik Jacobson <erikj@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:42:07 -0500
Cc: Erik Jacobson <erikj@xxxxxxx>, pagg@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051004153414.GA9154@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
References: <20051003184644.GA19106@sgi.com> <20051003185155.GB19106@sgi.com> <20051003190219.GA20154@sgi.com> <20051004153414.GA9154@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
Sender: pagg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
> Should it be possible to compile job as a module, or should
> this not be "tristate"?
> 
> It makes use of send_group_sig_info, which is not EXPORTed.

You are right, the patch is supposed to export that variable as well.
I must have forgot to add it to the file list using quilt before sending
it out, and I tested it as built-in so I didn't catch it.

I'll fix this.  Thank you.

We're only using send_group_sig_info because it does a check for signal
'zero' which means status check.  send_sig_info doesn't do that check any
more.  We could probably just handle this inside job some how and use
send_sig_info instead.

--
Erik Jacobson - Linux System Software - Silicon Graphics - Eagan, Minnesota

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>