| To: | Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11 |
| From: | Erik Jacobson <erikj@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:02:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | Erik Jacobson <erikj@xxxxxxx>, Kingsley Cheung <kingsley@xxxxxxxxxx>, pagg@xxxxxxxxxxx, tonyt@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <433B80B6.2010604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050617014512.GA10285@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050927201020.GA30433@xxxxxxx> <433A7FE4.5040109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050928141831.GA24110@xxxxxxx> <433B80B6.2010604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | pagg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
> In fork-hook, scaning the parent's list is indeed read-only. > But exit-hook contains writing-operations like list_del_rcu(), > thus something locking is required. > Probably, the ratio of readonly-pass and writable-pass might be > about 49.9%:50.1%. (Although I didn't actually measure it.) I guess if all tasks have subscribers, this could be true... Even in Job, not all tasks have subscribers although I admit that if you are using it with PAM so each login starts a new job... most would. I tried to send what I had so far twice yesterday but the list server is eating it for some reason. Someone is going to check in to the list server configuration today. I'll respond to more of your post later. Erik |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11, Kaigai Kohei |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11, Erik Jacobson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11, Kaigai Kohei |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11, Erik Jacobson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |