pagg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11

To: Erik Jacobson <erikj@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11
From: kingsley@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:06:26 +1000
Cc: pagg@xxxxxxxxxxx, tonyt@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050623143301.GB32764@xxxxxxx>
References: <20050617014512.GA10285@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050623143301.GB32764@xxxxxxx>
Sender: pagg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:33:01AM -0500, Erik Jacobson wrote:
> Kingsley - my first attempt skipped the list, sorry.
> 
> > While testing the propagation of pagg_attach errors to fork() I
> > noticed that the detach callback is called again for the client
> 
> I'm sorry it's taking a while for me to get back to you.
> I had kicked your patch around to a couple people internally and
> I think we want to investigate the error path more before we
> take it as part of the PAGG patch.
> 
> Does anybody else on the list have thoughts on this change?
> 
> Thanks for the submission. I'd like to do a bit more research.

Hi Erik, 

Has there been any progress on this?

Thanks,
-- 
                Kingsley

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>