pagg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?)

To: Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?)
From: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 05:08:07 -0800
Cc: erikj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pagg@xxxxxxxxxxx, limin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lse-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, guillaume.thouvenin@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <41FA330A.2030303@ak.jp.nec.com>
Organization: SGI
References: <Pine.SGI.4.53.0501181437280.627920@subway.americas.sgi.com> <41F8E117.5030501@ak.jp.nec.com> <20050127081753.5a9d16af.pj@sgi.com> <41FA330A.2030303@ak.jp.nec.com>
Sender: pagg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thank-you for your informative response.

Kaigai wrote:
> But what I really wanted is a Common fork()/exit() event handling framework.

Could you expand on this a bit?  Especially since you acknowledge that loadable
modules are not particularly essential to your work, I am curious as to what
else you find valuable in such a fork/exit framework.

> it will make to restrain the unregulated hook functions in fork()/exit().

I will confess to not quite making sense of this statement - sorry.

Thanks for your reply so far.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>