Re: 2.6.7 pagg patch available

[Erik Jacobson <erikj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Did you include my modifications in this patch?

All I did was resolve the build issues for 2.6.7 and tested to be sure it
still worked.

I sort of have a dilema here.  We're going to post pagg and job to LKML
tomorrow and I don't know how to test all the changes.

You had mentioned you didn't think adding the new features would make it
harder to accept.  But, on the other hand, what we have now is well
understood and we have test cases for most situations.  The pagg code we
have no has been through the ringer once already.

What do you think?    Any other thoughts?

Erik