[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ogl-sample] OpenGL-SI 1.3

To: ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ogl-sample] OpenGL-SI 1.3
From: Jon Leech <ljp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 19:12:17 -0700
In-reply-to: <01090802375408.01001@rogue>; from laguest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:37:54AM +0100
References: <01082619173401.08239@rogue> <20010905150812.A9026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01090802375408.01001@rogue>
Reply-to: ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:37:54AM +0100, Luke A. Guest wrote:
> BTW, will SGi be retracting the Opensourceness of the SI? I ask because I
> have heard that OpenML is closed :-(

    I believe I already responded to much the same question in a
previous message, but no, we are not doing anything to change the SI
license. OpenML has nothing to do with the SI, for that matter.

    You can't meaningfully talk about OpenML being "closed" or "open" in
the OSI sense, because OpenML is not source code; OpenML is a
specification for a set of APIs. The Khronos group intends for there to
be open source implementations of those APIs, just as the SI and Mesa
are open source implementations of the OpenGL API. I'm sure there will
also be closed source implementations from some vendors.

    Jon Leech

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>