[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ogl-sample] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLU rpm available from SGI sample impl

To: Olivier Michel <Olivier.Michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ogl-sample] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLU rpm available from SGI sample implementation
From: "James A. Treacy" <treacy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:01:43 -0400
Cc: ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx, mesa3d-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <39D1B1F9.27C0CF96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Olivier.Michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:38:17AM +0200
References: <39D05E34.AE609837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39D0AA43.C96BC197@xxxxxxxxxxx> <39D1B1F9.27C0CF96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Olivier Michel wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
> > Is the /usr/include/GL/glu.h header included in the binary RPM?
> Yes. By the way I put it in /usr/include/GL but I discovered that some recent
> Mesa-devel packages put the include files in /usr/X11R6/include/GL and the
> libraries in /usr/X11R6/lib/. My package defaults to /usr/include/GL for the
> includes and /usr/lib for the lib. However, it is relocatable that is users
> can install it in /usr/X11R6 by typing rpm -Uvh --prefix=/usr/X11R6
> package.rpm. But the question is: What is the standard localtion for Mesa
> include and libraries, /usr or /usr/X11R6 ?
IMO, the mesa libs should use /usr/include and /usr/lib. My reasoning
is that /usr/X11R6 is for X only programs and mesa can be used to
render directly to a file.

James (Jay) Treacy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>