Il giorno 12/ott/05, alle ore 05:53, Andrew Morton ha scritto:
--- ../../trunk/sis900.h 2005-07-17 10:43:23.000000000 +0200
+++ sis900.h 2005-10-06 12:49:37.000000000 +0200
Please prepare patches in `patch -p1' form. See
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt.
Yes, I did send a corrected patch some days later, when I found out.
This was the only correction I made there, so you can just trash it.
+ /* Detect Wake on Lan support */
+ ret = inl(CFGPMC & PMESP);
+ if (netif_msg_probe(sis_priv) && (ret & PME_D3C) == 0)
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Wake on LAN only available from
suspend to RAM.", net_dev->name);
+
How come? Why doesn't it work after an ordinary `halt -p'?
That register should report, according to the specs, the status of
the additional power supply needed to keep awake the chip when the
computer is shut down. Usually there is an additional cable to be
installed between the NIC and the motherboard, but on laptops or
embedded chips it's difficult to know.
@@ -2015,6 +2082,8 @@
.get_settings = sis900_get_settings,
.set_settings = sis900_set_settings,
.nway_reset = sis900_nway_reset,
+ .get_wol = sis900_get_wol,
+ .set_wol = sis900_set_wol
};
We normally add a comma to the final field so that subsequent
patches look
cleaner.
Will do.
Thanks for the comments.
--
Daniele Venzano
http://www.brownhat.org
|