| To: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:56:53 +0200 |
| Cc: | Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050823190852.GA20794@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050815213855.GA17832@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43014E27.1070104@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050823190852.GA20794@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello!
Simon Kirby writes:
> I was under the impression, however, that the code Alexei added last time
> I brought up this problem was intended to always allow gc when the the
> table is full and another entry is attempting to be created, even when
> under gc_min_interval.
Yes your GC does not work at all in your 2.6 setups...Why?
> rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|
> entries| in_hit|in_slow_|gc_total|gc_ignor|gc_goal_|gc_dst_o|in_hlist|
> | | tot| | ed| miss| verflow| _search|
> 131062| 22| 125633| 125629| 125447| 182| 181| 837163|
> 131062| 0| 13511| 13509| 900| 12609| 12609| 10|
> 131062| 0| 8772| 8770| 600| 8170| 8170| 7|
> 131062| 0| 8709| 8706| 600| 8106| 8106| 8|
> 131062| 0| 8771| 8770| 600| 8170| 8170| 6|
> 131062| 0| 8770| 8768| 600| 8168| 8168| 6|
> 131062| 0| 8706| 8704| 600| 8104| 8104| 10|
Can you try
echo 50 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |