Re: netdev @ sgi still processing emails? WAS

netdev

Re: netdev @ sgi still processing emails? WAS

To:	jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: netdev @ sgi still processing emails? WAS
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C045E1103@orsmsx408>
References:	<C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C045E1103@orsmsx408>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:03:30 -0700

> Is there some reason to keep both lists open?  It does appear the
> marc.theaims is getting both.

It might be wise to kill it off in a month or two.
After that much time has passed, there really isn't any
reason not to have moved over to the new list location.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
netdev @ sgi still processing emails? WAS (RE: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c), Brandeburg, Jesse Re: netdev @ sgi still processing emails? WAS, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc1 8/17] bonding: SYSFS INTERFACE (large), Mitch Williams
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.1 5/12] S2io: Performance improvements, Arthur Kepner
Previous by Thread:	netdev @ sgi still processing emails? WAS (RE: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c), Brandeburg, Jesse
Next by Thread:	transceiver problem, Sebastien Vincent
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]