|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] multipath routing algorithm, better patch|
|From:||Patrick Jenkins <patjenk@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:17:35 -0400 (EDT)|
Thomas Graf wrote:* Patrick McHardy <42C4919A.5000009@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-07-01 02:43
Yes, we did experience a problem. The routing doesnt work as advertised (i.e. it wont utilize the multiple routes). Patrick is correct in saying its missing support.
From what you are saying it seems the problem will be corrected by a new feature in iproute2 that allows the user to select this ability. Is this correct? Also, does this mean my patch is not needed? It seems to me that it should be supported somehow in the kernel seeing as how everyone might not utilize iproute2.
Once again, please cc me in the reply because I am not a member of the list.
Thanks, Patrick Jenkins
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Thomas Graf|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Eric Dumazet|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH] multipath routing algorithm, better patch, Thomas Graf|
|Next by Thread:||[PATCH 2.6.13-rc1 0/17] bonding: Sysfs Support, Radheka Godse|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|