netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch

To: ak@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, becker@xxxxxxxxx, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050622211058.GY14251@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050622180654.GX14251@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050622.132241.21929037.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050622211058.GY14251@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:10:58 +0200

> 8 entries? That sounds very small. Is that an old Sparc or something? :)

Hey, Sparc does suck, this isn't news for anyone :-)

> Looks reasonable. Not sure about the "most optimal" though, some benchmarking
> of different schemes would be probably a good idea.

Absolutely.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>