| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] devinet: cleanup if statements |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 21 Jun 2005 23:51:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | pmeda@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050621.134822.21926602.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200506072032.NAA06207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050621.134822.21926602.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > This whole area is pretty messy, we should examine the true > intended semantics of the ifa_label stuff. Perhaps it would be best to just retire that 2.0 alias compatibility cruft now. Everybody should be using ifconfig or iproute2 by now that can add or remove addresses directly without the compatibility syntax. They never worked fully in corner cases anyways, e.g. SIOCSIFNAME with these aliases was always a problem. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Donald Becker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] devinet: cleanup if statements, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] devinet: cleanup if statements, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |