netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: netpoll and the bonding driver

To: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: netpoll and the bonding driver
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:01:14 -0400
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050620002118.GA16859@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <17075.10995.498758.773092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050619181436.GX27572@xxxxxxxxx> <20050620002118.GA16859@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
==> Regarding Re: netpoll and the bonding driver; "John W. Linville" 
<linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> adds:

linville> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 11:14:36AM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:

>> > I'm trying to implement a netpoll hook for the bonding driver.
>> 
>> My first question would be: does this really make sense to do? Why not
>> just bind netpoll to one of the underlying devices?

linville> Depending on the bonding mode, this would be very unlikely to
linville> work.  The other side of the link will still be expecting to talk
linville> to the bond rather than to an individual link.

Right, and for those drivers which register a netpoll_rx routine, they may
not get all of the packets destined for them.

-Jeff

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>