| To: | "'Pavel Machek'" <pavel@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: ipw2100: firmware problem |
| From: | "Alejandro Bonilla" <abonilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:33:08 -0600 |
| Cc: | "'Jeff Garzik'" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Ketrenos'" <jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David S. Miller'" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20050610090022.GF4173@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <abonilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Hi!
>
> > OK. I understand the point and I totally agree with this.
> We really want
> > the adapter to just do what the user or profiles ask the
> adapter to do.
> > Yes, in an ideal world.
> >
> > Let's talk about easyness. These adapters are in laptops.
> You don't want
> > to type a lot of stop everytime you move from access points, reboots
> > and
>
> We are not trying to make it hard to the users. Lets do the right
> thing in kernel, and let userspace make it easy.
> Pavel
Pavel,
Agreed then.
|
| Previous by Date: | RE: ipw2100: firmware problem, Alejandro Bonilla |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: BCM5704 performance questions., Jason Lunz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, John Stoffel |
| Next by Thread: | RE: ipw2100: firmware problem, Alejandro Bonilla |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |