| To: | jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:21:19 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx, mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506091510560.16917@ladlxr> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506091406590.10396@ladlxr> <20050609150546.61b0fee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506091510560.16917@ladlxr> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:12:09 -0700 (PDT) > I saw that... somehow iptables got compiled into kernel statically. no > rules are active or installed iptables -L -n shows nothing in any chain. Netfilter can kill performance, even if no rules are loaded at all. Please take that out of your kernel. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Jesse Brandeburg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |