[Top] [All Lists]

Re: netdev munching messages again?

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: netdev munching messages again?
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:44:23 -0400
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050608132953.GK20969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <20050607140842.778143000@axs> <20050607140901.632982000@axs> <20050607213621.GG20969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050607.144237.93024273.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050608132953.GK20969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I thought netdev just picks on me ;-> My stoopid ISP as well
as have some "clever" (read: questionable) ways 
of delivering email which violates end to end semantics of SMTP.
I too noticed some emails were swallowed in the last 1-2 days. I know
from past experience in fact they will never be seen again;->
Or someone, who doesnt look at the headers, will flame me for repeating
what has already been discussed and agreed on (has happened to me at
least 5 times on netdev ;->).

It's quiet ironic when packets delivered over TCP dont make it to the
remote end, even when the app tries to help in reliable delivery;->

CCing El-sido Bacchus.


On Wed, 2005-08-06 at 15:29 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * David S. Miller <20050607.144237.93024273.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-07 
> 14:42
> > I did get all of your postings because you sent them
> > with me on the CC: list, but netdev only sent out
> > 6 and 7 to me just as you observed.
> I tried to resend, the message were accepted by but
> none of them came back. Maybe dropped due to duplicated message
> ids though.
> > This has become a regular occurance, it may be time to finally move
> > this thing over to  Thoughts?
> I have no personal objections, would be valuable to take over the
> archives though.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>