| To: | john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:21:59 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx, mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0450C01F@orsmsx408> |
| References: | <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0450C01F@orsmsx408> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:23:32 -0700 > There also seems to be some misconceptions about changing the weight > value. It actually improves the performance of other drivers as well. > Not as much as it improves the e1000 performance but it does seem to > help others as well. One reason it helps e1000 more, which Robert Olsson mentioned, could be the HW irq mitigation settings used by the e1000 driver. Lowering these would be a good test. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch] devinet: cleanup if statements, pmeda |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Ronciak, John |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Jesse Brandeburg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |