| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:29:50 -0700 |
| Cc: | <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>, <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Venkatesan, Ganesh" <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcVq0KInJf0GW6tXQUu/BgSh9BGIAQABPK1A |
| Thread-topic: | RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
> If you force the e1000 driver to do RX replenishment every N > packets it should reduce the packet drops the same (in the > single NIC case) as if you reduced the dev->weight to that > same value N. But this isn't what we are seeing. Even if we just reduce the weight value to 32 from 64, all of the drops go away. So there seems to be other things affecting this. We are just talking about single NIC testing at this point. I agree that single and multi-NIC results different issues and we will need to test this as well with whatever we come up with out of this. I also like your idea about the weight value being adjusted based on real work done using some measurable metric. This seems like a good path to explore as well. Cheers, John |
| Previous by Date: | Re: New address announcements in RTMGRP_IPV4_IFADDR netlink group, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] tg3: Fix link failure in 5701, Michael Chan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | RE: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Mitch Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |