| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops? |
| From: | Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:00:46 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1DeLwo-0005GI-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050603232413.GA29308@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1DeLwo-0005GI-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 09:51:30AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > I'd say that either you're using a dodgy qdisc, or your hardware is > just stuffed. That is, if you are using the default qdisc, you should > start looking at replacing pieces of the hardware to find the problem. Yes, default qdisc. Interesting that 2.6.10 is rock solid on the same hardware...oh well. Phil |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops?, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops?, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops?, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |