Re: [SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock

netdev

Re: [SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock_bh

To:	herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock_bh
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jun 2005 22:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050602095459.GA26638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20050602094404.GA10316@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050602095459.GA26638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:54:59 +1000

> The call in question is only called from recvmsg which means that
> IRQs aren't disabled.  Therefore it is safe to replace it with
> spin_lock_bh.
>  
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Also applied to net-2.6.13, thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[IPV4/IPV6] Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh, Herbert Xu [SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock_bh, Herbert Xu Re: [SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock_bh, David S. Miller <= Re: [IPV4/IPV6] Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: [IPV4/IPV6] Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip), Kosta Todorovic
Previous by Thread:	[SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock_bh, Herbert Xu
Next by Thread:	Re: [IPV4/IPV6] Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh, David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]