| To: | Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: non-fatal oops with EIP at skb_release_data, available for debugging |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 May 2005 18:21:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5a4c581d0505281811a6b067d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5a4c581d05030412482a596ee5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5a4c581d05040615306f12ebde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050525220003.5f6ab060.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <5a4c581d0505281811a6b067d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/26/05, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Quoting my post of over a month ago, hit another > > > non-fatal oops this time with 2.6.12-rc1-bk2... > > > > Has this bug been sighted in more recent kernels? > > 2.6.12-rc2 is the last kernel I've been running on that box > and the oops never happened once. I'm waiting for -final > or -rc6 and then load it on that K7-800, but so far 2.6.12-rc2 > has been rock solid. I think it was reaching the 30 days > uptime but my building had a power outage last week... There should be a -rc6. Please be sure to test that - we don't want to let 2.6.12 out with a bug like this in it, thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] r8169: support restricting speed+duplex in autonegotiation, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Q: ieee80211_txb, Zhu Yi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: non-fatal oops with EIP at skb_release_data, available for debugging, Alessandro Suardi |
| Next by Thread: | [doc][git] playing with git, and netdev/libata-dev trees, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |