netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:16:37 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1117296041.19563.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050527141320.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527151913.GA15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527165935.GC15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117242749.6251.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050528012810.GN15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117244893.6251.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050528121827.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117296041.19563.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
* jamal <1117296041.19563.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-28 12:00
> > I just tested both patches for about 30 minutes. Everything OK. Feel
> > free to apply the patches.
> 
> We have another problem. What tree is this against? Both patches have
> failures patching against latest davem and linus git trees.

It's against my davem-pending tree which should reflect the current
state of davem's tree so they _should_ apply on his side. In this
specific case you're probably missing the neighbour table patches.

Basically I produce diffs this way:

separate tree per patchset -> merge into  testing tree ->
testing period -.  merge into $person-pending -> extraction
of patches and submission.

I was trying to get some more quality control into my workflow,
so I started testing patches for 3-4 weeks to avoid fallouts
but apparently this is failing miserably at the moment due to
some broken scripts of mine.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>