| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 21:06:55 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050527170135.GE15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527125010.GO15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527141320.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527151913.GA15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527165935.GC15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527170135.GE15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ok, looks good. Dave please apply this one instead of the one i posted this morning - it incorporates the name change as well. Incase its not clear - 1/2 in this patch set is also fine. cheers, jamal On Fri, 2005-27-05 at 19:01 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > This patch rectifies some rtnetlink message builders that derive the > flags from the pid. It is now explicit like the other cases > which get it right. Also fixes half a dozen dumpers which did not > set NLM_F_MULTI at all. > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |