netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 21:06:55 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050527170135.GE15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527125010.GO15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527141320.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527151913.GA15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527165935.GC15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527170135.GE15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ok, looks good. Dave please apply this one instead of the one i posted
this morning  - it incorporates the name change as well. 
Incase its not clear - 1/2 in this patch set is also fine.

cheers,
jamal

On Fri, 2005-27-05 at 19:01 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> This patch rectifies some rtnetlink message builders that derive the
> flags from the pid. It is now explicit like the other cases
> which get it right. Also fixes half a dozen dumpers which did not
> set NLM_F_MULTI at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>