| To: | Christoph Lameter <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] e1000: NUMA aware allocation of descriptors V2 |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 16:25:28 -0700 |
| Cc: | ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shai@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505271450200.25909@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505171854490.20408@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050517190343.2e57fdd7.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505171941340.21153@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050517.195703.104034854.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505172125210.22920@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050517215845.2f87be2f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <5fc59ff305051808558f1ce59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050518134250.3ee2703f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505271450200.25909@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Christoph Lameter <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > NUMA awareness for the e1000 driver. Allocate tx and rx descriptors > on the node of the device. > > It is safe to replace vmalloc by kmalloc node since only the descriptors > are allocated in a NUMA aware way. These will not be so large that the > use of vmalloc becomes necesssary. Really? That's probably OK with the default number of tx descriptors, but that number can be made arbitrarily large with a module parameter. Could you please work this with the e1000 developers? |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 5/5] [PKT_SCHED] textsearch ematch, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [IPSEC] Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notification, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] e1000: NUMA aware allocation of descriptors V2, Christoph Lameter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |