| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 11:57:46 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050527151913.GA15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527125010.GO15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527141320.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527151913.GA15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2005-27-05 at 17:19 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > Sure, I can come up with a patchset today which will include: > o the new NLMSG_NEW macro > o your patch adopted to use the new NLMSG_NEW macro > o small patch to rename NLMSG_PUT_ANSWER usages into NLMSG_NEW_ANSWER > o a small fallout from the new neighbour table code which gcc didn't > warn me about when it should. > > OK? Sounds reasonable. cheers, jamal PS:- Have to disappear for a few hours so they maybe latency in further responses. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4] IPv4/IPv6: UDP Large Send Offload feature, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |