netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:19:13 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527125010.GO15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527141320.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
* jamal <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-27 11:01
> Dave please apply the patch i posted into your tree and then we can
> follow with this other stuff. 
> Actually Thomas, you can probably apply my patch on your side and then
> the other changes to use _NEW() on top of it. If you dont have time i
> could do it tommorow.

Sure, I can come up with a patchset today which will include:
 o the new NLMSG_NEW macro
 o your patch adopted to use the new NLMSG_NEW macro
 o small patch to rename NLMSG_PUT_ANSWER usages into NLMSG_NEW_ANSWER
 o a small fallout from the new neighbour table code which gcc didn't
   warn me about when it should.

OK?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>