| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 17:19:13 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527125010.GO15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050527141320.GQ15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1117206091.6383.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-27 11:01 > Dave please apply the patch i posted into your tree and then we can > follow with this other stuff. > Actually Thomas, you can probably apply my patch on your side and then > the other changes to use _NEW() on top of it. If you dont have time i > could do it tommorow. Sure, I can come up with a patchset today which will include: o the new NLMSG_NEW macro o your patch adopted to use the new NLMSG_NEW macro o small patch to rename NLMSG_PUT_ANSWER usages into NLMSG_NEW_ANSWER o a small fallout from the new neighbour table code which gcc didn't warn me about when it should. OK? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] [NEIGH] neighbour table configuration and statistics via rtnetlink, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |