David, would you consider applying that patch to mainline? I think
there was concensus on this solution, and it has now received some
amount of testing by Hasso and me.
Thanks!
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:31:15PM +0300, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> Harald Welte wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:55:02AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> >
> > > Didnt boot ;->
> > > A small silly magic number i missed. Now boots - but doesnt mean it
> > > works. And i dont have much time to spare chasing it.
> >
> > Due to a customer having again trouble with this issue, I was forced to
> > actually spend some time testing it (and merging it to a current
> > kernel). At least in my simple tests, it worked like a charm :)
>
> I'm using it for some weeks in production and haven't noticed any issues
> either. Would be really good to see it kernel.
>
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Hasso Tepper
> Elion Enterprises Ltd.
> WAN administrator
>
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
linux-2.6.12-rc2-promote_secondaries.patch
Description: Text document
pgpXA3rx0JkiU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|