| To: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO v3 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2005 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1DaKZK-0006Qv-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050523.121943.78708600.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1DaKZK-0006Qv-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 07:34:38 +1000 > Are there non-Linux systems that have the same receive issue? Some generate stretch ACKs for other reasons (miscalculation of MSS due to TCP Timestamps) but I doubt any other OS implements the Van Jacobson ucopy stuff we do, and also implement the same ACKing hack on top of that :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.12-rc4-mm1] ethtool: Add NETIF_F_HW_CSUM support, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why /sys/class/net/*/features is read-only?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO v3, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO v3, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |