| To: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BUG 2.6.12-rc4] IPv6 xfrm tunnel oops with large packets |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 May 2005 05:18:17 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | christophe@xxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050521194932.GA10959@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <1116702611.14509.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050521194932.GA10959@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050521194932.GA10959@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sun, 22 May 2005 05:49:32 +1000), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:10:11PM +0000, Christophe Saout wrote: > > > > The oops occurs in line 391 in net/ipv6/icmp.c: > > > > > idev = in6_dev_get(skb->dev); > > Here is a minimal fix. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > BTW, icmpv6_send seems to ignore its dev argument altogether. > Any reason why we can't just use it instead of skb->dev? (After looking into icmpv6_send() usages,) I don't know the reason why we needed the last argument "dev". It seems that we already had it at the time of 2.2.16. Probably, we can remove it. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Network driver behaviour when loosing link, Michael Renzmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BUG 2.6.12-rc4] IPv6 xfrm tunnel oops with large packets, Christophe Saout |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BUG 2.6.12-rc4] IPv6 xfrm tunnel oops with large packets, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BUG 2.6.12-rc4] IPv6 xfrm tunnel oops with large packets, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |