netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:25:27 +0400
Cc: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050519.114901.108984882.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: MIPT
References: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0505190915010.15522-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1116510411.6240.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050519.114901.108984882.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 11:49 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:46:50 -0400
> 
> > However, something like connector should only get one ID and it can do
> > its own multiplexing based on "units".
> 
> Yes.  There is no reason connector needs more than one
> netlink ID.

It does not require several IDs.

-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>