netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: igmp snooping?

from [jamal] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jonathan Day <imipak@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: igmp snooping?
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:43:41 -0400
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050519050958.86591.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <20050519050958.86591.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 2005-18-05 at 22:09 -0700, Jonathan Day wrote:
> mentation-dependent.
> 
> Now, in 99.99% of all cases, you're not going to have
> any significant IGMPv3 traffic, as barely anyone uses
> it yet and IGMP specifies that the highest common
> version will be used in a group. 

A significant amount of video type apps that i have seen lately
try to use IGMPv3 and then fallback to IGMPv2. I think that this may be
aggravated due to our friends at MS discovering IGMPv3.

cheers,
jamal
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, James Morris
Next by Date:  Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, jamal
Previous by Thread:  Re: igmp snooping?, Jonathan Day
Next by Thread:  [PATCH] Ethernet Bridging: Enable Hardware Checksumming, Jon Mason
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]