| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 09:19:33 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx, <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050519000809.2fca25c5.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > We should remove the feature. If there is demonstrated need for multiple > instances then it should be done by more conventional means - syscall, > allocation of a device major then use the minor as a selector or whatever. I'd suggest removing the connector code completely. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: igmp snooping?, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |