| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 May 2005 11:52:13 +1000 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akepner@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050518013712.GH13748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050517.104947.112621738.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1DYAHF-0006qW-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050518004733.GG13748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050518011632.GA27813@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050518013712.GH13748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:37:12AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > > OK, I initially thought you would head for a much larger > threshold. Not sure if 30000 is large enough for a full > scale NFS server though ;-> You conviced me that my idea I think it's big enough. If it isn't it means that somebody has reordered the packets by 30000 which I find hard to believe :) -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000, Christoph Lameter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |