| To: | ak@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 May 2005 14:24:06 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, akepner@xxxxxxx, jheffner@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050517211300.GB79960@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050517202730.GA79960@xxxxxx> <20050517.140245.71090021.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050517211300.GB79960@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> Date: 17 May 2005 23:13:01 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 23:13:00 +0200 > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:02:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> > > Date: 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200 > > > > > But it's not clear such a hack would be worth it anyways. > > > If anything it would be probably better to let mountd set the RTTs, e.g. > > > implicitely with MSG_CONFIRM (I hope it is using it these days ...) > > > > I think we should implement a solution that goes beyond > > the confines of NFS. > > Nothing in MSG_CONFIRM is NFS specific. I'm referring to mountd. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/12] orinoco: monitor mode support, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Rick Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Rick Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |