| To: | John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 May 2005 12:52:20 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200505171531.37167.jheffner@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505170914130.29021@xxxxxxxxxx> <428A425F.7000807@xxxxxx> <428A452B.2010008@xxxxxxxxxx> <200505171531.37167.jheffner@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 |
John Heffner wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 03:25 pm, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:Yes, a different manifestation of the problem ;). I was talking in the context of current Linux code and the common ethernet drivers and typical current Internet/Intranet latencies.The problem is latency independent. Not entirely - because our reassembly timeout expires, typically. (If I understand you right). thanks, Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/12] orinoco: monitor mode support, Pavel Roskin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, John Heffner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, John Heffner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |