| To: | net dev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | ip_forward difference in kernel 2.4 and 2.6 |
| From: | cranium2003 <cranium2003@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 May 2005 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT) |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=6U4kASgCUHWSzGcWxJK8gUaZW2UsjNFXdL7ee4aTpe6T/NvWxCpzG7iv+iKOhXO5T1sDhHp4jFCWGCg/TiA0QZrh5b1mXo2yEIPZ0gp5tICmg+2LY0AHmC575gA5Wm4YG05tow9411urXxOlwU89sogvrCq8ODEjWzTtrJBmXtQ= ; |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
hello,
I check kernel 2.4.28 and 2.6.11 on lxr and
found that there is condition to check fragmnetation
required for packet in 2.4.28 ain ip_forward.c as
if (skb->len > mtu && (ntohs(iph->frag_off) &
IP_DF))
goto frag_needed;
But same will not be seen in 2.6.11 why? Then how 2.6
kenrel check this condition? Why its removed? Is it
addedd somewhere else?
Thanks in advance.
regards,
cranium
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [2.6 patch] remove net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_icmp.c?, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPV4/IPV6] Ensure all frag_list members have NULL sk, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 10/12] orinoco: always use 802.11 header for rx processing, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] add open iscsi netlink interface to iscsi transport class, Mike Christie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |