| To: | ak@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: issue with new TCP TSO stuff |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 May 2005 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <m1sm0sttvy.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050511.223036.39664020.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1sm0sttvy.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> Subject: Re: issue with new TCP TSO stuff Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:13:05 +0200 > Are you sure a few atomic_inc/dec are really causing noticeable > slowdown? That would surprise me unless you have lots of cache line > bouncing on a MP system. It's about 7 or 8 times as many atomic gets and puts on pages compared to the older code (with an 8K page size). Some of it we can't get rid of, because we keep a normal write queue segmented set of SKBs around. But the TSO part we can eliminate. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Questions wrt QoS code on Linux, Jonathan Day |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: issue with new TCP TSO stuff, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: issue with new TCP TSO stuff, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: issue with new TCP TSO stuff, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |